Get quantified savings, risk and compliance initiatives - ranked, owned and ready to run.
Spend Intelligence
Data In, Savings Out.
How it works
Data in
SAPPO_2026_Q1.xlsx
ERPvendor_master.csv
APinvoices_global.xml
ERPAPI to Microsoft Dynamics
Spend Intelligence Agents
Results out
€3.4M savings
Vendor consolidation · steel
€184K savings
IT hardware over-contract
€68K savings
Material Price over benchmark
One engine, four kinds of measures
Every transaction is evaluated across all four goals at once. So a single dataset returns a complete, prioritized agenda for strategic procurement.
Cost Optimization
Consolidation, price harmonization, rebates and renegotiation. Ranked by recoverable euros.
Risk Mitigation
Single-source dependencies, exposure and supplier concentration flagged before they bite.
Compliance
Maverick spend, off-contract buying and missing requisitions surfaced for review.
Process Optimization
Duplicate records, fragmented orders and payment-term gaps that quietly cost time and cash.
Inside an Insight
Findings you can act on, not dashboards you have to decode. Spend Intelligence doesn't hand you another chart to interpret. It writes the recommendation, attaches the money, and lines up the next move.
- Quantified, not vague
- Ready-to-run actions
- Trace it in Spend Analytics
IT Hardware
Price harmonization
Cross-legal-entity · 1 vendor
Hardware GmbH leaves ~€700k in cross-entity price gaps
€700K
Identified savings
9%
Savings potential
Hardware GmbH charges different legal entities different prices for the same recurring IT and AV items. Across €7.7M of comparable invoice spend, the gap to the best internal price is about €0.7M — aligning vendor onto one group price level captures roughly €0.7M near-term.
Confidence 84%
Ask KIRA “Why do entities pay different prices for the same item?”